Nyt ur - Budget 30.000

[willy]

Baun Skrev:

willy Skrev:If yo have 30000 go after a used IWC.Their watches are in a much better class than Omega.Or even a used Rolex is a much better buy.Omega make good watches but in my opinion they are no where near Rolex or IWC. Willy

Omega er mere for pengene end IWC. IWC er dyrere end Omega og det er primært branded man betaler for. Kvalitetet en stort set ens. Just my five cent.

Willy vil uden tvivl nu henvise til at hele den store verden er enig med ham, men det er den så ikke. <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: -->

vh Baun

No Per i will not say what the international watch world thinks.A IWC is quite simply a better made watch than Omega.You know as well as i do that Omega have been trying for years to go a notch up in the watch world.They want to compete with Rolex and IWC-JLC etc.But they are a massed produced watch like Brietling and they have not succeded yet.Rolex are also mass produced on a assembly line but they are true inhouse and the quality is better at this time.ETA who make great calibers by the way are so closly connected to Omega that i think it will be difficult for Omega to threaten Rolex.I like Omega watches and i think they give great value for money sometimes.But IWC are producing around 40-50000 watches a year compaired to Omega who make over a Million.IWC have a reputation second to none inclusive Rolex for making quality watches.Even the ETA calibers that IWC use are far far better than anything Omega have ever put inside one of their watches.IWC do not just polish a ETA caliber like Omega they completly rebuild it.And IWC make true inhouse calibers that are respected for reliability and craftmanship.You can say what you like Per but you cannot ignore the facts And when we talk about branding IWC do not have 10% of the budget for advertising that Omega have.Quality always wins in the end Willy