11-05-2010, 06:38 PM
KlausM Skrev:Da jeg ikke skal dykke mere end et par meter ned er det for mig lidt ligegyldigt om den er vandtæt til 3900m eller 300m. Dette tool watch begreb er blevet så flydende at man ikke kan tale om mere eller mindre tool watch. For mig er parametre som design, materialvalg, kvalitet samt historie vigtigere. Helt enig i at Rolex slår AP Diver på historie når talen kommer på dykkerure men DS designet er ikke et hit på niveau med AP Diver.
In my book the DS is as much (or even more) a cafédiver as the AP![]()
No serious diver would choose any of the two anyway <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: -->
I like both watches but for desk use the specifications don´t matter that much.
Mvh
Klaus
Citat:wrong klaus ask Comex or the divers on oil rigs they use rolex as back up.And design does not mean a shit when your life can depend on it .And has for who is the hit with their diver tell me you are joking.I would place a bet with anyone that in twenty years any DS will cost more than any AP diver from the same year.And i would say that for desk use a Roger Dubuis beats the AP anyday.
![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)