Et "ægte" bond ur til salg.

[tg]

Hammerslaget bliver helt sikkert 100.007 kr

Sendt fra min E5823 med Tapatalk

[willy]

Ok Guys its like this.Ian Flemming who wrote Bond wore a Rolex.His hero in the book James Bond wore a Rolex.The reason for this is that Flemming and Bond were both ex Royal Navy.At this time in British History the Royal Navy was the place where M15 recruted most of their operatives.Nearly all top ranking officers in M15 were from the RN.And guess what was the only watch issued to Royal Navy personall.Yes a Rolex!Ian Flemming worked for M15,before becoming a author.

                                  Omega just like IWC with their Top Gun watches,have just used the film to try to promote their watches.Now we all know that Bond films are just harmless fun for the masses.And if the masses want to believe that their hero wears a Omega,that is all down to the Omega marketing department.But one thing they cannot do is rewrite the truth.
                                I myself was issued with a Sub in the RN.It was the only watch at this time that could take the punishment we put them through.
                                  Rolex would never name a new Moonwatch after a science fiction film.The Moonwatch is the Omega.And the real Bond watch is a Rolex Sub.

[peterkaa]

(24-01-2016, 09:32 AM)willy Skrev: Ok Guys its like this.Ian Flemming who wrote Bond wore a Rolex....

...Explorer ref. 1016.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=120138 Skrev:..Only one brand is specifically named as that secret agent’s watch in Fleming’s original 14 Bond editions: Rolex. The greatest detail comes in his eleventh book, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service, published in 1963. Here we read of the “big luminous numerals” that Bond sees when taking a lazy midnight glance at his chronometer, “a heavy Rolex Oyster Perpetual on an expanding metal bracelet.” The watch is a "Rolex Explorer I"...

Hvilket selvfølgelig alt sammen er ligegyldigt. Da vi her taler om the baddest of bad guys' ur, som nu kan købes, hvis man ellers er til den slags.

Jeg foretrækker uret frem for eksempel is E. Blofelds kat eller "Jaws'" gebis, selv om det er et Omega ;-)

[ultoman]

Nu ved jeg godt man skal passe på med at puste til ilden, men her kommer alligevel et lille pust 

Først må jeg lige slå fast at jeg ikke er et James Bond orakel, jeg ser filmene og det er det :)

Jeg vil derfor antage at Ian Flemming ikke længere er forfatter på de sidste par 007 film, hvilket vel ikke betyder at James Bond nu er blevet falsk ;) og det lader til at de nye forfattere mener at James Bond bære Omega, hvilket vel gør at Omega nu er det rigtige James Bond ur (ved godt det hele handler om penge og product placement). Så det lader til at den kære James Bond har skiftet smag, hvilket vel han skal være i sin fulde ret til. 

Så det ægte, vil set fra det perspektiv, altid være det som den nuværrende James Bond bære, hvor Seiko/Rolex vil være de tidligere ægte :)

Omkring hammerslag, så ville mit skud i tågen blive: +100.000

[TioMalo]

(24-01-2016, 09:32 AM)willy Skrev: Ok Guys its like this.Ian Flemming who wrote Bond wore a Rolex.His hero in the book James Bond wore a Rolex.The reason for this is that Flemming and Bond were both ex Royal Navy.At this time in British History the Royal Navy was the place where M15 recruted most of their operatives.Nearly all top ranking officers in M15 were from the RN.And guess what was the only watch issued to Royal Navy personall.Yes a Rolex!Ian Flemming worked for M15,before becoming a author.

                                  Omega just like IWC with their Top Gun watches,have just used the film to try to promote their watches.Now we all know that Bond films are just harmless fun for the masses.And if the masses want to believe that their hero wears a Omega,that is all down to the Omega marketing department.But one thing they cannot do is rewrite the truth.
                                I myself was issued with a Sub in the RN.It was the only watch at this time that could take the punishment we put them through.
                                  Rolex would never name a new Moonwatch after a science fiction film.The Moonwatch is the Omega.And the real Bond watch is a Rolex Sub.

Så sikkert som det er sagt:



Mvh. John

[KimT]

(24-01-2016, 11:44 AM)ultoman Skrev: Nu ved jeg godt man skal passe på med at puste til ilden, men her kommer alligevel et lille pust 

Først må jeg lige slå fast at jeg ikke er et James Bond orakel, jeg ser filmene og det er det :)

Jeg vil derfor antage at Ian Flemming ikke længere er forfatter på de sidste par 007 film, hvilket vel ikke betyder at James Bond nu er blevet falsk ;) og det lader til at de nye forfattere mener at James Bond bære Omega, hvilket vel gør at Omega nu er det rigtige James Bond ur (ved godt det hele handler om penge og product placement). Så det lader til at den kære James Bond har skiftet smag, hvilket vel han skal være i sin fulde ret til. 

Så det ægte, vil set fra det perspektiv, altid være det som den nuværrende James Bond bære, hvor Seiko/Rolex vil være de tidligere ægte :)

Omkring hammerslag, så ville mit skud i tågen blive: +100.000

Fuldstændig enig.

Jeg kender godt historien, men fordi man starter ud med noget og det ændres hen ad vejen (af marketings årsager) gør det ikke noget ægte/uægte for mig. Der startede med at være en forfatter som mente der skulle bruges Rolex og bestemte skuespillere m.v. Alt er løbende udskiftet - skuespillere, forfattere, ejere af "brand", urene osv. osv. osv.

For mig er Rolex det rigtige i de film det blev brugt, ligeså med Seiko og Omega. Og var der i øvrigt ikke også en hvor han brugte Breitling - det mener jeg at huske?

Hvis jeg skiftede min hustru ud med en ny som jeg blev sammen med resten af vores tid, var hun jo heller ikke en falsk kone. Det ville så betyde at min eks var den ægte og eneste rigtige bare fordi hun var den første. Sådan hænger det ikke sammen i min verden - heldigvis 

[TioMalo]

Jeg har nok den relativ typisk "+ 50 årlig" holdning: Kan ikke rigtigt tage "post Ian Fleming" filme som rigtig James Bond, ditto med alle andre skuespillere end Sean Connery.
Rigtigt nok, Ian F. skrev (fantasi), sig som model for Bond-figuren og Bond´s klokke var et Explorer. Den nævnte Rolex fleks-lænke er god nok: Rolex producerede på 40´ne og 50´ene Oyster-flexlænker ved siden af det almindeligt Oyster. Der findes ikke mange tilbage, lænkens konstruktion var naturlig nok noget mere skrøbelig end almindelige Rolex´. Har stødt dog i ét eksemplar; en gulddouble rædsel... IMHO not nice.
Bonds NoDate Sub skulle have været producerens ur som Sean C. lånte i mangel af bedre. Filmproduktioner på tidlig 60´ene var noget mindre spektakulære end de samme i dag.

Mvh. John

[Krüger]

Citat:Jeg har nok den relativ typisk "+ 50 årlig" holdning: Kan ikke rigtigt tage "post Ian Fleming" filme som rigtig James Bond, ditto med alle andre skuespillere end Sean Connery.

1000% enig

[willy]

Apart from all the marketing junk,who the hell needs this Mickey Mouse advertising on a wristwatch?Collectors do not take them seriously.Limited editions of 5000,you must be kidding.Thats about the total production of Lange.IWC have learned their lesson,and have removed the stupid little airplane from their new Top Gun models.I personally would never buy a watch with film connections on the dial.All the actors who played Bond after Connery,have been B film pinn up boys.None of them except Danial Craig,have recieved any critical acclaim for their acting ability.In the good old USA and England Bond fims are at the level of  Walt Disney.History always judges watches after real merit.That is why watches worn or owned by real actors like Steve Mcqueen,or Paul Newman are worth a lot of money today.They were real actors with many awards for their screen preformance.If people who buy these 007 watches think they have something special on their wrist,they should think again.Many people think it rather comical to see people who wear a wrist watch connected to a fim.As you have most probably noticed,i hate these bloody watches

[peterkaa]

(24-01-2016, 08:36 PM)willy Skrev: Apart from all the marketing junk,who the hell needs this Mickey Mouse advertising on a wristwatch?Collectors do not take them seriously.Limited editions of 5000,you must be kidding.Thats about the total production of Lange.IWC have learned their lesson,and have removed the stupid little airplane from their new Top Gun models.I personally would never buy a watch with film connections on the dial.All the actors who played Bond after Connery,have been B film pinn up boys.None of them except Danial Craig,have recieved any critical acclaim for their acting ability.In the good old USA and England Bond fims are at the level of  Walt Disney.History always judges watches after real merit.That is why watches worn or owned by real actors like Steve Mcqueen,or Paul Newman are worth a lot of money today.They were real actors with many awards for their screen preformance.If people who buy these 007 watches think they have something special on their wrist,they should think again.Many people think it rather comical to see people who wear a wrist watch connected to a fim.As you have most probably noticed,i hate these bloody watches

Jeg skal lige sikre mig at du har læst artiklen om hvilket ur der er til salg?