Complications and tradition.
#1
Technical masteries and complications have all ways been the specialitys of brands like Patek-AP-JLC and IWC.There are other brands that make them today but none of them have the history of these brands.
Tourbillons have been the speciality of brands like Blancpain-Breguet the father of all Tourbillons.And of course Girard Perregaux master of the Three Gold Bridges maybe the most beautiful ever made.
Moonphase and Astronomical watches are the specialitys of Patek-Ulysee Nardin-IWC and Patek.
The Minute Repeater is the most expensive of all complications and few brands have made them.The brands that are famous for making this complication are Patek-IWC-AP
All of the above brands have been making these types of watches for over a century.They have a history of watchmaking expertise that puts them at the very top of Swiss watch brands.But in my eyes one brand is more unique than the others.Not because they make better watches than the others.But because they have covered nearly every aspect you can think about in watchmaking.And are without a doubt the Brand that have achieved more firsts in the industry than any other.That brand is IWC! They have covered such a broad spectrum of watchmaking unlike the other brands named above.
They made the first dive watch with a depth guage The Deep One.First diver to be waterproof at 2000 meters without the use of a Helium valve.First truly antimagnetic dive watch the Ocean.First antimagnetic watches Pilot and Ingenieur .The list is endless.They also make the Destriero Scafusia this is the most complicated serially produced watch in the world ever.
So if people on this site wonder why i have a soft spot for IWC and do not like them compaired to lesser brands.The answer is above for you to read.But i will say at the same time that in no way do i consider that IWC make the best watches out there.But i think they are quite special.What do you think? Willy
- Jeg er engelsk - bor i Danmark, forstår dansk - men foretrækker at skrive på engelsk Icon_smil
Svar
#2
Jeg syntes IWC har en unik value <!-- s:up: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_Up.gif" alt=":up:" title="Thumps up" /><!-- s:up: -->
og kunne jeg helt med int. lænker så havde jeg helt sikkert en 3536er Icon_cool
Yoshikazu Akahane. 28/+50.
Svar
#3
Jeg synes at IWC laver nogen fantatiske ure og med en finnish og udstråling af kvalitet, som jeg ikke har set hos andre.

Har selv et og så igår min kollegas chronograph pilot og denne var ligeledes fantatisk lækker.

Jeg er lykkelig over at have et IWC og tror ikke det bliver det sidste.
Anders 


Rolex Explorer 2 ref 216570 - Victorinox Inox - Seiko Orange Monster - Citizen divemaster "Pingo" - Casio G-Shock GD-110-1ER - Omega De Ville 1969
Svar
#4
IWCs tekniske formåen er virkelig noget som ihvertfald hos mig skaber dyb respekt for mærket,
har det tekniske ens interesse kan jeg anbefale at læse IWCs blad watch nr 3 2011
der går de Portuguese Siderale Scafusia igennem,kun et at sige RESPEKT <!-- s:admire: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_not.gif" alt=":admire:" title="Admire" /><!-- s:admire: -->
Yoshikazu Akahane. 28/+50.
Svar
#5
Jeg tror jeg holder en lille pause med at kommentere på alt der hedder IWC vs andre mærker. Det ser ud til at skabe flere skænderier end godt er. Icon_rolleyes
Men jeg kan da sige jeg er meget glad for min Aquatimer Icon_razz

Fortsat god dag!
Svar




Brugere der kigge i denne tråd: 1 gæst(er)