11-11-2015, 11:16 PM
(11-11-2015, 09:21 PM)P.N. Skrev:I think that is putting it a bit to simple(11-11-2015, 07:16 PM)willy Skrev:(11-11-2015, 06:14 PM)P.N. Skrev:Well Per if you Google the Rolex Oyster Quartz,or the Grand Seiko Quartz you will see this.Much better than i could try to explain it,especially to you(11-11-2015, 03:23 PM)willy Skrev: Anything in the lower price classes,with a bog standard mechanical caliber means nothing to me.I would rather have a watch with a high end quartz caliber,ex-Seiko - Rolex.Most mechanical calibers made today have absolutly no future value what so ever.They are spit out in the millions.Not like many vintage calibers that do have a degree of watchmaking built into them.A high end quartz caliber is better made and more reliable,than most of the mechanical junk out there.
I really do not care mechanical-quartz-handwound-automatik,it means nothing to me,unless it is very well made.I own two Rolex watches,a mechanical Milgauss and a Quartz Oyster.The caliber in the Quartz Oster is unique,and the caliber in the Milgauss is just ordinary in my eyes.
Hej Willy
Hvordan kan du se om et quartz-værk er af høj eller mindre god kvalitet og hvor finder du sporene af godt håndværk i quartz-ure ?![]()
Hilsen
Per![]()
![]()
I will find a link for you.http://www.oysterquartz.net/the_5035_movement.htm
https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/sexy-r...caliber-9f
Min påstand vil være at den store forskel ligger i at der er brugt tid og resurser på at få uret til at ligne et mekanisk ur ved hjælp af et tik-tak, mener du at det højner kvaliteten ?![]()
![]()
- Jeg er engelsk - bor i Danmark, forstår dansk - men foretrækker at skrive på engelsk

![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)