25-05-2015, 08:56 PM
(25-05-2015, 08:26 PM)jk Skrev:My answer was in no way an attempt to explain anything away.I just read in a interview with PD that he did work for PP.Not that i attach a lot on this.That is why i wrote about people changing jobs in the industry.If correct information means so much to you,then it must be fustrating to read about watch brands.Because not much of what we get from brands press releases is the truth.Like politics you have to learn to read between the lines.What you said about people working for different brands was just as totally irrelevent,as what i wrote about PD.And that was my point,that unfortunatly you missed.You seem to be waiting for me to make a mistake,you can jump on(25-05-2015, 07:49 PM)willy Skrev:Jeg fatter ikke en brik af, hvordan man kan forsøge at bortforklare en åbenbart forkert oplysning med, at det bare var for at gøre opmærksom på at urmagere og forretningsfolk i industrien skifter arbejdsplads engang imellem. Det er vist velkendt for de fleste.(25-05-2015, 07:25 PM)nicolaib Skrev: Hmm, mener bestemt Philippe Dufour har arbejdet for Jaeger Le-Coultre, AP + Gerald Genta. Men kan ikke huske at han har arbejdet for Patek Philippe.It was meant as a little reminder,that in the watch industry executives and watchmakers can have worked for many different brands in their lifetimes.It does not mean so much in the long run.
Forkerte oplysninger betyder i min verden noget både i the long run and the short run.
JK
Ps.This link provides some imformation about the work he did on various brands watches.Pay special attention to the statement from PD about who built the complications.
http://www.thepurists.com/watch/features...ws/dufour/ He did work for many brands as a independant watchmaker,even Lange.
- Jeg er engelsk - bor i Danmark, forstår dansk - men foretrækker at skrive på engelsk

![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)