26-03-2015, 04:12 PM
olof Skrev:1. Hush! We don't need further vintage collectors, the prices are constantly on the rise anyways
2. This Omega Movement - caliber 552 - is indeed excellent, and in a way "better" than later Omega movements, especially from the period early 70ies into the 90ies. However it is not really hand-crafted, although the production and assembly did certainly require more manual steps than nowadays.
3. Other than that I do fully agree, and it is the main reason, why I do stick to vintage - there is simply better value for the money. And this Omega is an example from an aftersought, big brand. Try to look at more unknown ones like Favre Leuba or Enicar (only the Sherpa-range is expensive, but You find the exact same movement quality also in their regular dress-watch collections)
4. Hvorfor skrev jeg det nu paa engelsk...
Citat:Okay i will keep quiet <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> .Let us agree there is a lot more watchmaking skill put into them.And yes i wondered as well, why you replied in english.
- Jeg er engelsk - bor i Danmark, forstår dansk - men foretrækker at skrive på engelsk

![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)