Ligner noget vi har set før > > >

[willy]

Jesper Geisler Skrev:

willy Skrev:I think i would rather buy a Seiko with a inhouse reliable caliber for 2000 kr . Looks like a very cheap and tatty Tudor copy to me . I just cannot see any point in it at all .
Willy

Det var underligt. Eksperter på alverdens brugerfora omhandlende ure, er ellers enige om, at Seagulls kaliber ST2130 er mindst ligeså pålidelig som de billigste automatik værker fra Seiko - hvis ikke mere pålidelige/robuste. Google it - et det ikke dét du plejer skrive!
Måske kasse & lænke er i en bedre kvalitet end 2000 DKK Seiko klokker. Vi ved det ikke - for hverken du eller jeg har haft den pågældende model i hånden.

I must be honest i would not buy any mechanical watch for that kind of money . Even one made in the Swiss Alps I would get a Quartz Watch instead . There is a very good reason many brands get watches made in China . They have a natural talent for making things well , at very low cost . The bloggs i have visited about this watch showed no tests or in depth critical reviews of it . If you know of any Jesper , please share them with us . Made in China . Is not in my opinion always a negative stamp on any product . You get what you pay for in this world . And i still think it is a cheap Tudor copy , that i personaly would not wear even if someone gave me it .
Willy