28-04-2012, 09:25 AM
Mads Gjødesen Skrev:Willy hvorfor mener du et brugt IWC er et bedre køb end et tilsvarende Omega? Jeg mener Omegas ETA modeller giver mere eller i hvertfald mindst samme value-for-money som IWCs ETA baserede modeller. Desuden er det både lettere og hurtigere at få serviceret et Omega i DK. Prisniveauet er ca. det samme.IWC rebuild their ETA calibers to a much higher standard compaired to Omega.Also they have true inhouse calibers where Omega still use ETA calibers.And I think most of the watch experts in this world know that IWC have a tradition and workmanship that far excedes Omega.I agree with what you say about Top gun models and i think IWC have to be carefull in the future.Many of their new models are to mainstream for my liking.To be honest i do not think you can compare a brand that have built some of the greatest complications in the watch world,to a mainstream brand like Omega.Brietling and Omega are mass produced watches with a minimum of handwork.You cannot say the same about IWC. Willy PS. Before anyone jumps on my back. I am not saying Omega or Brietling make bad watches
Brandmæssigt er IWC knap så fremme i skoen som Omega, men derimod har IWC lavet modeller som Topgun og div. LE dykker modeller der også lugter langt væk af markedsføring. Så den ender vel 1-1?!
/Mads
- Jeg er engelsk - bor i Danmark, forstår dansk - men foretrækker at skrive på engelsk

![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)