modificerede ETA-værker?

[Jacob H_phpbb3_import15808]

Mikael Lange Skrev:Det jeg vil frem til (jeg er selv in-hose og Rolex-mand) er: skal vi altid hakke på mærker der bruger ETA-værker, eller kan det være okay med fx. 2892-eren i en modificeret Chronometer udgave?

Mikael

De korte svar fra min hånd:

1) Nej-

2) Ja.

Jeg har endnu til gode at se en valid test, der afgørende dokumentere, at Rolex 3135 skulle være mere præcis eller robust end et sammenligneligt chronometer certificeret 2892, 2824 ETA-værk - modificeret eller ej - eller omvendt for den sags skyld.

Citat:So how does it (ETA 2892 red.) compare to the competition? There are some movements that match it in terms of accuracy and reliability, but in my humble opinion, none exceed it. The Rolex 3035 and 3135 match it toe to toe. But they are a lot thicker and considerably more expensive too. The PPs, while being very pretty to look at, do not match it for accuracy and are more delicate as far as reliability is concerned. Of course they’re also slightly thinner, so that does put them at a disadvantage. The JLC 889/2 does match it for accuracy, but is also too delicate to give it any competition in the reliability department. The main reason for the latter is its very weak mainspring. The whole design, while being well thought out and superbly executed, relies too much on everything being just perfect. It is just thrown out of wack too easily, when even minor things go out of adjustment. I don’t have too much experience on the Blancpain/Piguet movements. But from the few that have crossed my bench, they don’t seem to deliver the same accuracy that the 2892 has no trouble delivering.

[url]"http://www.chronometrie.com/eta2892/eta289202.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.chronometrie.com/eta2892/eta289202.html[/url]"

Men jeg bliver gerne kloger