Spørgsmål om kvalitet

[willy]

hannover_dk Skrev:

willy Skrev:yes i was talking about the bornholmer kontra a new watch.And in that context the only comparison today is a watch like a Lang or PP.If you want that kind of hand build then you have to go after a vintage for example Omega. Willy

and yes I get/got your point - though comparing such an old hand build clock (Bornholmer) with a modern wrist watch does not make so much point

Still even in new watches (and bugger- I do not remember for certain, but think the question was
Omega/tissot/fortis/certina) - you should see a difference between the brands, and the person asking, and putting quality high, could probably be happy with a new Omega 8500 og 8501 co-axial in-house watch (but probably also finding that expensive judging from the brands there was in question)

It is not with hand made components all the way and not patek - but it is quality and miles above the other 3 brands the thread starter asked about, and can in all fairness be described as a good quality wrist watch.
I did get you point however but also that it was very much jumping to a very fast solution when comparing a 250 years old bornholmer with a new watch.

@The person asking in the first place: - you can find watches in all the 4 brands you asked about (if I am right in remembering) that will last your life if taken care of, and keep reasonable time.

OF the 4 brands you ask about - Omega has historically produced the by far highest quality, and also today, you can find very good quality from them - but not hand build to detail

br

Citat:

Yes of the 4 brands i would take the Omega but not a new one Willy