-

[willy]

Kalle Skrev:

willy Skrev:The new Aquatimer models are no where near the quality of the old models . They are just mainstream desk divers that have recieved universial critisism from nearly all watch critics. They have been called the worst watches IWC have ever built , and i agree . I would not own one if you gave it to me . Willy

Du kan da ødelægge enhver god stemning, skal jeg love for. Nu havde jeg ellers glædet mig til at spare op til sådan et lækkert ur, men jeg må da lige undersøge om det kun er dig der er yderst kræsen (det fornemmer jeg efterhånden på forum) eller om andre synes det samme om de nye Aquatimere. Hvis det er tilfældet, nøjes jeg bare med mit nye Sinn U1, som jeg er vældig glad for. Så kan jeg bruge sparepengene på andre hobbyes <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: -->

PS: Gad vide hvordan du "lyder" når du kritiserer på DANSK

Sorry if i spoiled your day <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> I have read lots of reviews on the new Aquatimer , and talked to a few IWC dealers . It is actually a good seller for IWC world wide because it is more mainstream . It looks just like thousands of other mainstream divers out there. And most IWC enthusiasts do not like it , because it does not look like a IWC . The quality is the usual IWC ,the exception is it looks just like any other desk diver . And like it or not it did recieve a lot of bad reviews all around the world when it came out . This means it will never ever become a collectors item because it is not a respected watch . I could have written that it is a wonderfull watch etc etc , and not spoiled your day but i decieded to give you a honest opinion instead .And i hope this is subjective enough for you . And as some one said , it is just my opinion . Willy