Det bedste ur

[willy]

Mr AP Skrev:Ikke for at smide benzin på bålet men hvis:
-the gear train
-wheels and levers
-mainspring and barrel
-a 21 K gold mass is added to the rotor for winding efficiency

udgør 75 % af et urværk, tror jeg vi bør have folk tilbage på skolebænken og lære %-regning, for der er blot tale om de mest essentielle dele mht. sikring af præcisionen. God nok gør IWC meget for at forbedre deres ETA baser, men der er fortrinsvis "blot" tale om at skifte delene i drivværket samt finish af værket. Listen over mærker der modtager ETA værker som komponenter frem for færdigsamlet er lang.

Er selv mest til Aquatimeren, men det er absolut ikke IWC's behandling af ETA værket i forhold til Omegas behandling der gør forskellen.

All parts are machined again to IWC specs.So in reality it is 100%.That is why for years IWC could call their ETA calibers Inhouse.If you look in old watch books or magazines you will see this.It was a tradition for years in the Swiss watch industry.And it is just not true to even suggest that Omega have ever done this.Every single watch expert on the net who have respect have said this.IWC have been totally rebuilding ETA calibers for years.Why is it that we do not check the facts before writing? Opinions are one thing facts are another.I could put hundreds of links on this site that verify what i am saying.So lets have a few links if you can find them that verify anything said so far about Omega versa IWC.I think these links only exist in the fantasy world. Willy PS. Forgot to say that of course it is the difference in the making of the caliber.And just about everything else.People are free to believe what they like on this site.But you might be intrested in the fact that Omega have never won a vote over IWC anywhere else in the world.And they have held a few believe me <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> Willy