Spørgsmål om kvalitet - Printviselig Version: +- Urdebatten / Urforum (https://urdebatten.dk) +-- Forum: Hovedfora (https://urdebatten.dk/forumdisplay.php?fid=79) +--- Forum: Urforum (https://urdebatten.dk/forumdisplay.php?fid=70) +--- Tråd: Spørgsmål om kvalitet (/showthread.php?tid=75295) |
Re: Spørgsmål om kvalitet - hannover_dk - 31-01-2011 jacob jensen Skrev:Du læser jo ikke hvad jeg skriver hannover men danner dit eget billed igen igen Re: Spørgsmål om kvalitet - baun - 01-02-2011 Hej Viper Hvis vi skal snakke mere om Omega må du vist over på Omega forum. Jeg bidrager ikke i tråde som denne er ved at udvikle sig til. vh Baun Re: Spørgsmål om kvalitet - willy - 01-02-2011 hannover_dk Skrev:Geodoc Skrev:Omfatter ens kvalitetsbegreb også respekten for evnen til at fungere nøjagtigt - og oven i købet bedst, kan man roligt købe nedenstående ur.Fine tal og jo gode nok. Trådstarter gør det jo nok lidt vanskeligt ved at skrive om kvalitetskravet: Citat:yes i was talking about the bornholmer kontra a new watch.And in that context the only comparison today is a watch like a Lang or PP.If you want that kind of hand build then you have to go after a vintage for example Omega. Willy Re: Spørgsmål om kvalitet - hannover_dk - 02-02-2011 willy Skrev:yes i was talking about the bornholmer kontra a new watch.And in that context the only comparison today is a watch like a Lang or PP.If you want that kind of hand build then you have to go after a vintage for example Omega. Willyand yes I get/got your point - though comparing such an old hand build clock (Bornholmer) with a modern wrist watch does not make so much point Still even in new watches (and bugger- I do not remember for certain, but think the question was Omega/tissot/fortis/certina) - you should see a difference between the brands, and the person asking, and putting quality high, could probably be happy with a new Omega 8500 og 8501 co-axial in-house watch (but probably also finding that expensive judging from the brands there was in question) It is not with hand made components all the way and not patek - but it is quality and miles above the other 3 brands the thread starter asked about, and can in all fairness be described as a good quality wrist watch. I did get you point however but also that it was very much jumping to a very fast solution when comparing a 250 years old bornholmer with a new watch. @The person asking in the first place: - you can find watches in all the 4 brands you asked about (if I am right in remembering) that will last your life if taken care of, and keep reasonable time. OF the 4 brands you ask about - Omega has historically produced the by far highest quality, and also today, you can find very good quality from them - but not hand build to detail br Re: Spørgsmål om kvalitet - willy - 02-02-2011 hannover_dk Skrev:willy Skrev:yes i was talking about the bornholmer kontra a new watch.And in that context the only comparison today is a watch like a Lang or PP.If you want that kind of hand build then you have to go after a vintage for example Omega. Willyand yes I get/got your point - though comparing such an old hand build clock (Bornholmer) with a modern wrist watch does not make so much point Citat:Yes of the 4 brands i would take the Omega but not a new one Willy |