+- Urdebatten / Urforum (https://urdebatten.dk)
+-- Forum: Mærke-dedikerede urfora (https://urdebatten.dk/forumdisplay.php?fid=77)
+--- Forum: Rolex og Tudor (https://urdebatten.dk/forumdisplay.php?fid=68)
+--- Tråd: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? (/showthread.php?tid=57372)
Sider:
1
2
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - Amehlbye - 08-03-2012
hehe
Konklusion:
Mænd kan li biler og ure - og enige bliver vi aldrig - andet end enige om, vi kan li begge dele <!-- s:up: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_Up.gif" alt=":up:" title="Thumps up" /><!-- s:up: -->
Tak for den farverige forklaring alle sammen <!-- s:up: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_Up.gif" alt=":up:" title="Thumps up" /><!-- s:up: -->
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - berg - 08-03-2012
willy Skrev:Audi are near the bottem of the german ADAC list of reliable cars.So i would compare a Rolex with a Lexus because it is about the most reliable mechanical watch in the world bar none.Tudor are exceptionally well made and being owned by Rolex have a reputation to live up to.I would say a tudor Is very very close to Rolex in build quality only the Engine is different.But it is a very reliable caliber in a Tudor.So i would say Rolex=Lexus Tudor=BMW. Tudors are also holding prices very well in the vintage market. Willy
Willy, you are completely missing my point.
I chose to compare Rolex & Tudor with Skoda and Audi, because they are both owned by the same company (Volkswagen group) but they are two different kinds of cars that appeal to different kinds of people and furthermore do they have different price tags... exactly like Rolex & Tudor.
Let's arrange some of the brands in the VW group in order of "luxury status"
-Audi
-Volkswagen
-SEAT
-Skoda
Audi, as being in the top, with the more expensive price tag and a better "perceived" quality and stronger brand name... The way I see it, Audi would be comparable to Rolex, where Skoda on the other hand, is a budget version of "the same" car (they share a lot of parts) but with different brand value and price tag and therefore comparable to a Tudor.
Let's be honest, if one had the freedom of choice no one in their right mind would chose a Tudor/Skoda over an Audi/Rolex
If you want to compare a Rolex to a Lexus you should compare Tudor to a Toyota - there is no comparison with a BMW in that perspective what so ever (yes I own a BMW
)
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - HG - 08-03-2012
Da jeg havde Rolex havde jeg Opel.
Nu har jeg Tudor og Golf
Jeg syntes at rolex har bedre kvalitet, både i værket og kassen.
Tudor er, på det seneste, meget mere innovative end Rolex (Sky-Dweller en undtagelse) - Rolex er konservative og tager det sikre
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - willy - 08-03-2012
berg Skrev:Ok i can see your perspective in that comparison.Rolex is a luxury brand name and Tudor is a middle luxury brand.Lexus is a luxury brand and Audi is a middle luxury brand .That is why i compaired that way.Anyway your BMW is a much better built car than Audi <!-- s:up: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_Up.gif" alt=":up:" title="Thumps up" /><!-- s:up: -->willy Skrev:Audi are near the bottem of the german ADAC list of reliable cars.So i would compare a Rolex with a Lexus because it is about the most reliable mechanical watch in the world bar none.Tudor are exceptionally well made and being owned by Rolex have a reputation to live up to.I would say a tudor Is very very close to Rolex in build quality only the Engine is different.But it is a very reliable caliber in a Tudor.So i would say Rolex=Lexus Tudor=BMW. Tudors are also holding prices very well in the vintage market. Willy
Willy, you are completely missing my point.
I chose to compare Rolex & Tudor with Skoda and Audi, because they are both owned by the same company (Volkswagen group) but they are two different kinds of cars that appeal to different kinds of people and furthermore do they have different price tags... exactly like Rolex & Tudor.
Let's arrange some of the brands in the VW group in order of "luxury status"
-Audi
-Volkswagen
-SEAT
-Skoda
Audi, as being in the top, with the more expensive price tag and a better "perceived" quality and stronger brand name... The way I see it, Audi would be comparable to Rolex, where Skoda on the other hand, is a budget version of "the same" car (they share a lot of parts) but with different brand value and price tag and therefore comparable to a Tudor.
Let's be honest, if one had the freedom of choice no one in their right mind would chose a Tudor/Skoda over an Audi/Rolex
If you want to compare a Rolex to a Lexus you should compare Tudor to a Toyota - there is no comparison with a BMW in that perspective what so ever (yes I own a BMW
Willy
Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - berg - 15-03-2012
O
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - Peter - 16-03-2012
Hej
I Japan har man slet ikke Lexus, for der hedder den slet og ret Toyota.
MVH Peter
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - Stensbjerg - 16-03-2012
Hvilke jo stadigvæk ikke ændre på at de ikke genbrugte Toyota teknik da de skabte den første model og grundlagde mærket,
der kom jo heller ikke meget Chevy teknik ind under huden da Daewoo fik nye klistermærker
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - khbk - 16-03-2012
Navnet "Lexus" må siges at være godt fundet på. Ro-lex-us. Historien bag navnet er vidst en ganske anden.
Navnet "Rolex" er også godt fundet på!
Nogle ord "smager" bare bedre end andre!
Forresten: Lexus ER på markedet i Japan, fra omkring 2005-06!
Re: Rolex - Tudor - Kan nogen forklare? - willy - 16-03-2012
khbk Skrev:Navnet "Lexus" må siges at være godt fundet på. Ro-lex-us. Historien bag navnet er vidst en ganske anden.Sexus would be a good name for a Grand Seiko
Navnet "Rolex" er også godt fundet på!
Nogle ord "smager" bare bedre end andre!
Forresten: Lexus ER på markedet i Japan, fra omkring 2005-06!
Willy