brands in danger of losing their identity

[willy]

KlausM Skrev:Moderne må i denne sammenhæng referere til perioden fra dykkerurets udbredelse. Man kan ikke tale om normalt. Moderne skal henføres til en tid eller et emne. En moderne klassiker er Seamaster 300 fra 60'erne med de snoede horn og meget karakteristiske time markører.
Seamaster fra '93 må være en moderne klassiker af en moderne klassiker <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: -->
Mvh
Klaus

Citat:

omega seamaster was always a cheaper alternative to rolex submariner.it was a good watch for the money.but it was never a serious contender to rolex.the new seamasters have gone up in price.and they are still a long way behind rolex.ask any serious diver.again after any serious use they look like shit.i think the old seamasters where really good watches for the money.iwc aquatimers ,older models of course are in my opinion the only serious tool watch diver that can compete with rolex. willy