15-04-2008, 08:29 AM
Her er lidt om forskel i det stål der bruges til lænken (Omega vs. Rolex)
[url]"http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/smpvssub.html">http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/smpvssub.html[/url]
WINNER: Tough call here - each has obvious strengths and weaknesses. The SMP feels like a higher quality bracelet. The Sub would seem to be a bit less prone to show scratches. Rolex uses a higher grade steel (904) than Omega (316L) in the bracelet. However, I can discern no functional advantage for them to do so in a watch bracelet, and 904 grade steel is approximate 3 times more expensive than 316L. My research indicates 904 grade steel is more commonly used in industrial components which under constant exposure to highly corrosive substances (acids and the like) - conditions which a watch bracelet simply will not be exposed to. Therefore, there is no appreciable benefit to the 904 grade steel in the Rolex bracelet as compared to 316L used in the Omega bracelet. Indeed, no other watch manufacturer uses 904. For ease of sizing and scratch resistance though, this category belongs to Rolex: SUB
Jeg mener at have set noget lignende om kassen.....men kan ikke lige finde det!
Er det en dyb ridse? Hvis det "bare" er en lille (ikke dyb) ridse er det bare noget man må leve med hvis man bruger sit ur (går med det) - nogen kalder det "patinering"
Mvh
John
[url]"http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/smpvssub.html">http://www.rolexreferencepage.com/smpvssub.html[/url]
WINNER: Tough call here - each has obvious strengths and weaknesses. The SMP feels like a higher quality bracelet. The Sub would seem to be a bit less prone to show scratches. Rolex uses a higher grade steel (904) than Omega (316L) in the bracelet. However, I can discern no functional advantage for them to do so in a watch bracelet, and 904 grade steel is approximate 3 times more expensive than 316L. My research indicates 904 grade steel is more commonly used in industrial components which under constant exposure to highly corrosive substances (acids and the like) - conditions which a watch bracelet simply will not be exposed to. Therefore, there is no appreciable benefit to the 904 grade steel in the Rolex bracelet as compared to 316L used in the Omega bracelet. Indeed, no other watch manufacturer uses 904. For ease of sizing and scratch resistance though, this category belongs to Rolex: SUB
Jeg mener at have set noget lignende om kassen.....men kan ikke lige finde det!
Er det en dyb ridse? Hvis det "bare" er en lille (ikke dyb) ridse er det bare noget man må leve med hvis man bruger sit ur (går med det) - nogen kalder det "patinering"
Mvh
John
"It's better to have a need-not, than to need a have-not" 
IMHO
John
Seiko MM300 + "Atlas"
Omega 2xSpeedmaster + 2xSeamaster
Looking for: Fundings
IMHO
John
Seiko MM300 + "Atlas"
Omega 2xSpeedmaster + 2xSeamaster
Looking for: Fundings

![[-]](https://urdebatten.dk/images/collapse.png)