|
Real Debate - Printviselig Version: +- Urdebatten / Urforum (https://urdebatten.dk) +-- Forum: Hovedfora (https://urdebatten.dk/forumdisplay.php?fid=79) +--- Forum: Urforum (https://urdebatten.dk/forumdisplay.php?fid=70) +--- Tråd: Real Debate (/showthread.php?tid=57064) |
Re: Real Debate - watchfreak2003 - 15-01-2012 willy Skrev:I think this debate is turning into something that will end badly.For the first the JLC ad is nothing to do with the pictures or the articles mentioned so far in this blogg.I read this story on time zone or another blogg a long time ago.It is ridiculous to expect anyone to remember the excact time and where they read it.But i suppose in the future we could make it a rule that you are not allowed to write anything without comprehensive documentationDu vrøvler Willy. Jeg bad i går Howard Parr, Moderator på JLC forum, TimeZone & mangeårig Jaeger-LeCoultre entusiast, om assistance til et par links, så vi kunne blive lidt mere oplyste på denne sag. Howard Parr har nu svaret tilbage: Han har aldrig nogensinde set, eller hørt om den omtalte reklame. Han har heller aldrig set, eller hørt om diskussioner på hverken TimeZone eller andre fora, affødt af denne reklame! Dette sagt af en mand der er særdels godt inde i Jaeger-LeCoultre. Skal love for de oplysninger putter sig godt! Måske Willy er så vidende, at han er den eneste i hele verden der besidder viden om specifikke horologiske begivenheder? Eller digter du lidt historier hist & pist Willy, så det passer ind i det du ønsker at formidle videre? Dit behov for at fremstå vidende & oplyst er ....... atypisk! ”Der skal være plads til alle” ........ selv hulemænd & løgnagtige libertinere 500 DKK i dusør til den der kommer med de links der er nødvendige. Re: Real Debate - willy - 15-01-2012 hannover_dk Skrev:JLC har da været med i basis for værker til nogle af de andre store - men det er jo ikke JLC værker der som sådan lå i Patek og AP Re: Real Debate - KimT - 15-01-2012 Kunne vi ikke prøve at komme tilbage til emnet og lade diskusionen om den pågældende reklame ligge. (eksisterende eller ej) Det er ikke umiddelbart til at komme det nærmere, hvilket betyder at der ingen idé er, i at fortsætte med mudderkastningen Tråden er på vej over i det personlige, hvilket er en af de få ting vi ikke accepterer. Jeg låser ikke tråden "men back on track" ellers ender det sådan. Re: Real Debate - willy - 15-01-2012 watchfreak2003 Skrev:Jesper is Howard Parr God? Does he read everything written about JLC across the world?Does he read every watch forum ? Maybe he does i do not know.But i do know one thing you do not seem very intrested in JLC history.You seem to be more intrested in mine.I did read the article i mentioned and i remember it because the writer mentioned that JLC stopped future publication because of the embarresment it would cause.Now what reason can you give me why on earth i should tell a lie on this site? I think most people who know me understand i try to always be as honest as possible.I think you have taken this to a very personal level.And i for one would never call anyone on this site a liar for any reason what so ever.I would once again suggest we research a little more JLC.And to post a 500kr reward i am lost for wordswilly Skrev:I think this debate is turning into something that will end badly.For the first the JLC ad is nothing to do with the pictures or the articles mentioned so far in this blogg.I read this story on time zone or another blogg a long time ago.It is ridiculous to expect anyone to remember the excact time and where they read it.But i suppose in the future we could make it a rule that you are not allowed to write anything without comprehensive documentationDu vrøvler Willy. Re: Real Debate - hannover_dk - 15-01-2012 willy Skrev:Jesper is Howard Parr God?This is probably one of the more relevant questions in this discussion. Some will even discuss if God is God - and if he is - what his name is ???????- Very few will probably call him Howard - but they will kill to be right about his name - God - Allah as some of the most common discussion - and they will bring forward litterature to prove them right - and build temples in his name and kill for him. We are not there with our watches yet thanks Howard - God or Allah br Re: Real Debate - willy - 15-01-2012 hannover_dk Skrev:willy Skrev:Jesper is Howard Parr God?This is probably one of the more relevant questions in this discussion. Some will even discuss if God is God - and if he is - what his name is ???????- Re: Real Debate - willy - 15-01-2012 God is Wayne Rooney. Willy Re: Real Debate - watchfreak2003 - 15-01-2012 willy Skrev:Jesper is Howard Parr God? Does he read everything written about JLC across the world?Does he read every watch forum ? Maybe he does i do not know.But i do know one thing you do not seem very intrested in JLC history.You seem to be more intrested in mine.I did read the article i mentioned and i remember it because the writer mentioned that JLC stopped future publication because of the embarresment it would cause.Now what reason can you give me why on earth i should tell a lie on this site? I think most people who know me understand i try to always be as honest as possible.I think you have taken this to a very personal level.And i for one would never call anyone on this site a liar for any reason what so ever.I would once again suggest we research a little more JLC.And to post a 500kr reward i am lost for wordsWilly, hør nu her gamle jas. Du beskriver en episode vedr. Jaeger-LeCoultre. En 2-3 år gammel hændelse der ifølge dig, er diskuteret indgående på div. Fora rundt omkring i den store verden – bl.a. en af de største: TimeZone. INGEN har hørt om, eller kan finde noget om den hændelse du påstår, skulle være passeret. Du ”gider” ikke engang selv deltage i eftersøgning af det vi godt kunne tænke os at se. Det er sgu’ da underligt! De 500 DKK i dusør kunne måske anspore en der er dygtigere end gennemsnittet til at finde ting & sager på nettet. Jeg synes jo stadig historien er fantastisk, og er meget interesseret i at læse om det. Re: Real Debate - willy - 15-01-2012 I do not believe it is the article that intrests you anymore Jesper.I think we should get back to the discussion about JLC.As i told you before if i fall across the article again you will be the first i will contact.I do not see that one article has so much to do with the history of JLC.So i will look forward to your input and knowledge about JLC. Willy Re: Real Debate - watchfreak2003 - 15-01-2012 willy Skrev:I do not believe it is the article that intrests you anymore Jesper.I think we should get back to the discussion about JLC.As i told you before if i fall across the article again you will be the first i will contact.I do not see that one article has so much to do with the history of JLC.So i will look forward to your input and knowledge about JLC. WillyWilly! Det selvfølgelig helt naturligt, at du prøver alt hvad du kan på, at få pilen til at pege væk fra dig selv. I modsætning til dig, har jeg aldrig påstået, at ha’ det store begreb om JLC. Uanset hvordan vi vender & drejer det så: Har du stukket en plade, omskrevet sandheden, fundet på en historie. Du kan tro hvad du vil, men jeg er meget interesseret i diskussionerne du har ”opfundet” – og meget meget lidt interesseret i dig! ............ Men nu skal jeg nok lade dig få lidt fred. Håber din fremtid på ”Debatten” bliver nem & smertefri, så du uhindret kan få dine til lejligheden konstrueret ”røverhistorier”afleveret ukritisk! Mojn |