Urdebatten / Urforum

Fuld Version: This is not a review of the Omega Ploprof .
Du ser i øjeblikket en skrabet udgave af vores indhold. Se den fulde version med ordentlig formatering.
Sider: 1 2
Well it is and it is not . This is more about the purpose of the Ploprof .

Most reviews i read about watches are either paid for ,or written by people who like the brand that made the watch involved.

I have read every review i could possibly find about the Omega Ploprof . And in my opinion they are not honest , because the eyes looking at the watch are blind . I have chosen the Ploprof because i have just got this watch , but it could be many other watches i am talking about here .

If i write a normal review i would just be repeating 90% of what people can google about this watch . So i will try to review it in another way . My way . No! not the title of the Frank Sinatra song written by Paul Anka , i prefere the Sid Vicious version anyway .

This watch as got no real purpose in life at all . It is really of no use to any prof diver today except as backup for his diving computer. It wieghs over a quarter of a kilo and nearly needs a counter weight on the other side of your body when wearing it . There are hundreds of dive watches that can do the same as a Ploprof in a lighter and more discreet way . But it has something that few if any other watches possess . It has an overwhelming presence on the wrist that puts any watch i have ever seen to shame .

Can it be described as beautiful ? That depends on the eyes looking at it , just like every other watch in this world . In my opinion beauty was the last thing Omega were thinking about when they made this watch . They built it like a Tool or instrument that was made with only one specific purpose at that time . This alone makes it different from any coffee bar diver out there . It was not made with the purpose of selling thousands to the general public , unlike any other so called dive watches you see out there . It is the Landrover of the watch world , or Hummer Icon_e_smile

The Italian industralist Billionere - Playboy- and one of the most powerfull men of his time Gianni Agnelli wore a Ploprof as his daily watch . He was voted by Esquire magazine to be one of the 5 best dressed men ever in the world . He had enormous influence on mens fashion world wide , for decades .

I first saw this watch in the flesh at a dealer friend of mine about one year ago . My first impressions were that it was an extremely well made watch that certainly looked different , but was very heavy . I forgot about it for quite a while , and dismissed it as a watch i would never own . I could simply not see any purpose in the watch at all .

So what changed my mind ?

I was thinking one day about all the watches i have owned , in my search for a watch i would keep Icon_e_smile And i said to myself , you are never going to find the perfect watch in terms of function or beauty . So why not get a watch that serves the purpose you want more than others .

And what is the purpose i am looking for ? Well i have to be honest , all of my watches were never bought just for myself . They were also bought to impress other people and to start conversations . Sometimes a watch is much more than just a ornament on a persons wrist that tells the time . A watch can break the ice and help to start new conversations and even friendship . Of course i still liked the history and tradition of watchmaking , and choose my watches with this in mind .

The Proplof is a watch that most people either love or hate . And that alone is enough to intrest me . It looks like nothing else ever made in the watch world . And that is quite an achievment in todays slave fashion world , where individualists are in short supply . You can always break the ice at a dinner or party with a Ploprof Icon_e_smile I knew i would never own a super complication watch costing a few million . So i decided to get the next best thing . A watch that always gets noticed , and always intrests people when they first see it . And in my eyes it is a beautiful piece of industrial watchmaking .

Since owning this watch , i am beginning to understand Gianni Agnelli and his reasons as one of the great industrialists of his time in wearing this watch . Willy

PS. Gianna Agnelli is well worth a Google . A fasinating man who dared to be different .
Interessant og ærligt indlæg willy Icon_e_biggrin
Mvh
Klaus
Super indlæg Willy - en anderledes vinkel på et review ............ en slags "non-review", hvis man kan sige sådan ! Icon_smil

Mht. uret som et tool-watch, så er der en ekstra dimension, som man måske skal tage med i dag. Der er ingen tvivl om, at du har fuldstændig ret i, at uret i dag ikke ville blive anvendt i den funktion, som det fremstår som - altså som dykkerur. Professionelle dykkere bruger dykkercomputere m.v. og som du selv siger, så vil et "dykker-ur" alene blive anset for et back-up i bedste fald.

Men uret er jo rent faktisk heller ikke designet i dag - dagens PloProf er mere en form for "hommage" i ordets positive betydning, idet det er en moderne fortolkning/udgave af et ur, der i sin tid jo rent faktisk tjente det formål, som det var bygget til !

Så når man diskuterer det statement, som uret (også) repræsenterer i dag, så bør man nok have urets oprindelige og ægte tool-formål in mente og huske på, at der rent faktisk var en tid, hvor det blev taget alvorligt som et dykkerinstrument.

Dette skal ikke ses, som jeg er uenig med dig, Willy. Faktisk er jeg enig med de fleste af dine betragtninger, selvom dit "non-review" jo er dybt personligt og subjektivt.

Dette er mere ment som et supplement til hvad du skriver !

Men et fedt ur med en utrolig "presence" - et ur, som fascinerer mig, men som jeg ikke tror, at jeg nogensinde vil eje............ men det var jo egentlig det samme udgangspunkt, som du selv oprindeligt havde !! <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> Så, who knows !! Icon_e_wink
KlausM Skrev:Interessant og ærligt indlæg willy Icon_e_biggrin
Mvh
Klaus[/quote.
Citat:


Thank you Klaus . Icon_e_smile Willy
pbr Skrev:Super indlæg Willy - en anderledes vinkel på et review ............ en slags "non-review", hvis man kan sige sådan ! Icon_smil

Mht. uret som et tool-watch, så er der en ekstra dimension, som man måske skal tage med i dag. Der er ingen tvivl om, at du har fuldstændig ret i, at uret i dag ikke ville blive anvendt i den funktion, som det fremstår som - altså som dykkerur. Professionelle dykkere bruger dykkercomputere m.v. og som du selv siger, så vil et "dykker-ur" alene blive anset for et back-up i bedste fald.

Men uret er jo rent faktisk heller ikke designet i dag - dagens PloProf er mere en form for "hommage" i ordets positive betydning, idet det er en moderne fortolkning/udgave af et ur, der i sin tid jo rent faktisk tjente det formål, som det var bygget til !

Så når man diskuterer det statement, som uret (også) repræsenterer i dag, så bør man nok have urets oprindelige og ægte tool-formål in mente og huske på, at der rent faktisk var en tid, hvor det blev taget alvorligt som et dykkerinstrument.

Dette skal ikke ses, som jeg er uenig med dig, Willy. Faktisk er jeg enig med de fleste af dine betragtninger, selvom dit "non-review" jo er dybt personligt og subjektivt.

Dette er mere ment som et supplement til hvad du skriver !

Men et fedt ur med en utrolig "presence" - et ur, som fascinerer mig, men som jeg ikke tror, at jeg nogensinde vil eje............ men det var jo egentlig det samme udgangspunkt, som du selv oprindeligt havde !! <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> Så, who knows !! Icon_e_wink
Citat:
You are absolutly right Peter . But i left all that out on purpose . I tried as much as possible to leave out what i have read before about the watch . Even though it is bloody near impossible <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: --> Willy
Jeg forstår godt hvorfor, dette ur har tiltrukket dig.
Det var bestemt også et ur, som jeg gerne ville eje - også som det eneste!
Et af mine mest benyttede ure - egentlig to - er mine to Pingos.
Det er hhv gammel og ny model og vel egentlig ikke meget forskellige fra et Ploplof, hvis jeg må være så fri?
Det er selvfølgelig lidt som at køre 4x4 i den indre by?
Førøvrigt: Agnelli var kendt for at bære sit ur uden på manchetten og for ikke at knappe sine knapper i sine button-downskjorter!
Til lykke med værktøjer!
/
Kristen
"Ceci n'est pas une pipe"
- nej, men det ligner! <!-- s:lol: --><img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_lol.gif" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing" /><!-- s:lol: -->
/
Kristen
Kan man ikke se billeder?
Lænke eller gummi?
Ny eller gammel?
/
Kristen
[/quote]
khbk Skrev:Kan man ikke se billeder?
Lænke eller gummi?
Ny eller gammel?
/
Kristen

[url]"http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/just-because-a-hands-on-look-at-the-omega-seamaster-professional-ploprof-1200-live-pics" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.hodinkee.com/blog/just-becau ... -live-pics[/url]

You can see it here . I never buy new Icon_e_biggrin Willy
Sider: 1 2